This pamphlet contains two extracts. The first, "The Sovereignty of God in Salvation" by F.W. Grant is being reprinted from a previous version. The second, "One-Sided Theology: Calvinism and Arminianism" by C.H. Mackintosh originally appeared in his Miscellaneous Writings.

The Sovereignty of God in Salvation

The sovereignty of God is what alone gives rest to the Christian heart in view of a world, full of evil, which is gone astray from Him. To know that after all, in spite of the rebellion of the creature, things are as absolutely in His hand as they ever were—that we can still adore with the Apostle "One God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all" (Ephesians 4:6)—this alone brings full relief. He still rules over all, and where evil cannot be turned to good, He limits and forbids it; He makes the wrath of man to praise Him, and the remainder of wrath—what would go beyond this—He restrains.

The shepherd's rod—a symbol of power exercised in love—cast out of the hand to which it belongs and become a serpent, is a vivid picture of what we see on every side. It was the sign of a deliverer for Israel that Moses had but to stretch forth his hand and take back to him what was already his for it to become a rod in his hand once more. How sweet is this assurance for us! The rod had not slipped out of Moses' hand, but was cast out; even when cast out it was fully under his control. So it is with the government of this world; the prince of this world is not Christ, but Satan. For Him who rules it, though, even disobedience works obediently; Satan accomplishes His purposes as do the holy angels which wait around His throne. Through all, and in spite of all, He yet "worketh all things after the counsel of His own will" (Ephesians 1:11). "He doeth according to His will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay His hand, or say unto Him, What doest Thou?" (Daniel 4:35).

We rest, for we know who reigns. It is not mere sovereignty— the almighty despotism of mere will—to which we bow because we must, but the sovereignty of wisdom, holiness, and goodness of One in whom love is revealed in light. How strange and saddening that in any phase of it the sovereignty of God should be an unwelcome theme to a Christian heart! Surely one would say there must be something very wrong with the state of such an one, or with the manner of its presentation to him—or with both—for this to be the case. Yet is it not so that the sovereignty of God in salvation—and where else is the thought so simple and so necessary?—is by the large mass of Christians perhaps a thing most vehemently denied; even where the thought is entertained, it is entertained with coldness and suspicion. The truths of election and predestination, while the favorite objection in the mouths of unbelievers, are undoubtedly received with inward shrinking by many who receive them—as at most necessary, rather than really approved. Both causes named no doubt contribute to this result.

Yet if God be what He must be to be God—perfect goodness, and wisdom without fault—what could one possibly desire but that everything should be absolutely in His hand, plastic to and moulded by His blessed will, working according to plan and forethought His eternal purpose? It is not possible to conceive of objection on the part of any as worthy of the least respect. But this is all that predestination can imply. It is the simple and necessary result of a really divine government—of the supremacy of One who lacks neither wisdom, power, nor benevolent interest in the work of His own hands.

I know, of course, the objection that will be raised: "Open your eyes," it will be said, "and look around! Is the world as you see it just what you would expect as the fruit of a wise and perfect and omnipotent will? What of the suffering that abounds on every side? What of the sin? Can you say of that, 'It is the will of God,' and still attribute to Him nothing but perfection?"

It is of course true that we find around us a very different state of things from what we could have at all imagined from the necessary perfection of an almighty Creator and Governor. Nor dare we ascribe moral evil to the direct will of Him from whom it is a revolt. Nevertheless the doctrine of predestination remains our only comfort and support in this perplexity; to give it up would be to abandon ourselves to the despair of good as the final goal to which all tends. If the rebellion of His creatures has thus far thwarted the will of God, and filled the world with an unanticipated or unavoidable confusion, who can say how this may perplex the final result? On the other hand, complete foresight of all being His, with full power to avert whatever will not fall into harmony with His purposes, predestination of all things may be safely maintained. God is neither made the author of sin, nor compelled helplessly to admit defeat at the hands of men. This is what Scripture asserts as the truth of His government: "He worketh all things after the counsel of His own will" (Ephesians 1:11). "Surely the wrath of man shall praise Thee: the remainder of wrath"—foreseen in its issue as not glorifying Him—"shalt Thou restrain" (Psalm 76:10).

It may be said by some, "This is not predestination; this is only government." But what is worthy of God to do, it is worthy of God—and only worthy of Him—to determine before, even from eternity, to do. This fore-determination, or predestination, alters in no wise the character of what He does in its appointed time. It frees it only from the character of afterthought, which would imply weakness and change in Him. Thus we can say, "Known unto God are all His works from the beginning of the world" (Acts 15:18).

Take the worst act the world has ever seen: the crucifixion of Christ. It can be said, "Of a truth against Thy holy child Jesus, whom Thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, for to do whatsoever Thy hand and Thy counsel determined before to be done" (Acts 4:27,28). If it can be seen in this act, then we are privileged to read the hand and foreordination of God in all acts. Thus alone is the darkness relieved.

The will of man is recognized in all this, and not set aside. Certainly we are nowhere led, from Scripture, to think of him as a mere intellectual machine, moved necessarily by influences external to himself, but as a free, responsible being, though now fallen and become the willing slave of sin. It is certain that in no wise are we to think of God as determining to evil the wills of His creatures, or as involving them in irretrievable ruin, whether by (what is to them) the accident of their birth or in any other way. This Scripture unites with our own consciences to assure us. There may be difficulties, and there are; but however insoluble may be the mystery, God has given us that within us which witnesses unfailingly for Him that man's evil and man's ruin are of himself alone.

How, in spite of contrary and conflicting wills, God is yet as absolutely "above all, and through all, and in you all" (Ephesians 4:6) working all after the counsel of His own will, is beyond our skill to fathom. But so it is, and it is blessed to recognize that, as the Apostle witnesses, He is so as "God and Father of all." This is in fact the very web and woof of Scripture. This is what so irresistibly appeals to us in those tears wept over impenitent Jerusalem by Him who could pronounce its sure and approaching doom—a doom to be executed by the hands of men ignorant and careless of Him whose sentence they fulfilled.

This predestination extends to everything. Foresight and omnipotent will are everywhere. Thank God they are. In the moral—as in the physical—universe, nowhere can one escape from His presence, save by such an insensibility as the mass of men have sunk into. For the Christian, it is joy unspeakable to recognize this pervading presence, which when recognized brings light into darkness, order into disorder, and peace into whatever circumstances of distress. In the strain of triumph with which the Apostle closes his development of the Christian state in Romans 8, the basis of all is this precious doctrine: "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to His purpose. For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom He did predestinate, them He also called: and whom He called, them He also justified: and whom He justified, them He also glorified. What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?" (Romans 8:28-31).

But this leads us to another doctrine, closely connected with this of predestination and suffering the same reproach, even from those who owe their all to it. I mean, of course, the doctrine of election. Election is so plainly taught in the Word that it is surely only the opposition of the heart to it that can account for its not being universally received among Christians. Nor is this an election nationally or individually to privileges or "means of grace," but to salvation—salvation not on account of foreseen holiness or faith, but through, or by means of, these. "But we are bound to give thanks alway to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: whereunto He called you by our gospel" (2 Thessalonians 2:13,14). Nothing can well be plainer than this; nothing more positive than the assertion by the same Apostle of that "chain of salvation," link riveted to link, whereby predestination issues in calling, and calling in justification, and justification in glory. A hundred texts would fail to convince where two such as these would. But in truth, the difficulty is not textual—it lies elsewhere.

Election involves many another truth most humbling to man's pride of heart, and this is in a large number of cases the real hindrance. On the other hand, it is quite true that in the conflict of minds upon a subject which has been in controversy for centuries, the balance of truth has been very much lost by those who contended on either side. Extremes on either part have tended to throw men off into the opposite extreme. Thus Calvinism and Arminianism, or what are commonly socalled, have nearly divided Christians between them, with each refusing to recognize, for the most part, any truth in the other. Yet each has in fact its stronghold of texts and arguments, and its unanswerable appeals to conscience, never fairly met by the other. The mistake has been in the supposition that what was really strong on both sides was in necessary opposition. The fact is that, as another has said, the strength of each lies in what it affirms, and its weakness in what it denies. The truths of Calvinism cluster about the pole of Divine grace, and those of Arminianism about that of man's responsibility. The world revolves upon its axis between the two.

But, upon the ground of responsibility merely, men are lost. Hence the texts upon which Arminianism relies have to do with the world at large, with the provision made in grace for these, and the Divine appeals to and dealings with them. An important class of texts, however, even with regard to these, they overlook or explain away, while they infer wrongly from their general texts as to the actual salvation of those saved. Calvinism, on the other hand, when it treats of actual salvation, is almost wholly right. Scripture and conscience agree here in their witness to its truth, and the opposition made is compelled to be mainly upon another ground: namely, the supposed bearing of this upon the case of the lost. Here the Arminian is upon his own ground, and if the Calvinist follow him here he loses the strength he had, and Scripture and conscience turn against him.

Let us take up first the texts upon which the Arminian relies, and see how far they lead us before we speak of those which may seem more to suit our present subject.

In the first place, then, God's love to the world is manifested in the cross: "God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life" (John 3:16). It is not allowable to narrow this down to a love simply to the elect, as has been too often done. It is true that the elect are all originally of the world, and that thus He loves them when dead in trespasses and sins, and for His great love quickens them (Ephesians 2:4,5). But we cannot limit His love here to this: it is out of keeping with the whosoever which follows. Moreover the "world" cannot fairly be interpreted as less than the whole of it if we believe in the transparent honesty and accuracy of Scripture. God's love to the world, then, is so deep and wonderful that it can only be measured by the gift of His Son. We dare not refuse to credit fully what is so solemnly assured.

This being so, it settles decisively the meaning of Christ's death being for all: "For there is one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus; who gave Himself a ransom for all" (1 Timothy 2:5,6); "He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 John 2:2). These and many similar passages assure—without any doubt—of full and sufficient provision being made for all in the atonement.

Upon this ground, and to give express utterance to what is in the heart of God, the Gospel is bidden to be proclaimed to "every creature" (Mark 16:15). God assures men that "I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live" (Ezekiel 33:11). He "will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth" (1 Timothy 2:4). These testimonies are simple, and they deny that there can be any contrary decree of God hindering the salvation of any. The Redeemer's words as He wept over Jerusalem assure us that it is man's contrary will that resists God's will—"How often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" (Matthew 23:37).

But what shall we make of the will of man? Is there not after all in it, define it as we may, some mysterious power which, in spite of the fall and in spite of the corruption of nature, should yet respond to these invitations—these pleadings of divine grace? It is clear that final condemnation is not for any sin of another, nor for any depravity of nature derived from another, but for men's own sins. They are treated not simply as a race but individualized. Thus the Apostle teaches that the whole world is brought in guilty before God. Conscience bears witness in the same way of these individual sins, and refuses to put them down simply to the account of nature. Eternal judgment will be "according to their works" (Revelation 20:12,13)—a judgment which of course will recognize all diversity of circumstance and knowledge or ignorance of the Master's will, and will proclaim a personal difference to which "few" or "many stripes" will answer (Luke 12:47,48). All this is the exact opposite of a mere necessary development of a common nature, alike therefore under like conditions. Freedom, in some real sense, is recognized by us all—whatever our creed—as necessary to responsibility, although it is true that we may freely deprive ourselves of freedom and be accountable for this. There is a confessed mystery here which no one can pretend to solve, but Scripture and conscience unite to assure us that man's guilt is truly his own, and that all those tender pleadings, admonitions, and reasonings of God with man have in them a real suitability to men in general and are no vain show.

Man's will is no mere inheritance from his fathers as is his "nature"; it is something which in Scripture and in conscience is held as his own personal, righteous accountability. It constitutes him, we may say, a person—a man. To men God ever addresses Himself. Though they are fallen creatures, born in sin and shapen in iniquity, "by nature the children of wrath" (Ephesians 2:3), yet they are always and nonetheless proper subjects of appeal. If they are destroyed finally, they are selfdestroyed.

So the Spirit of God is represented as striving with them—with those who nevertheless "resist the Holy Ghost" to the last. It is of no special consequence whether we can show or not the manner of this striving; it is enough that the Word of God speaks of it as that. All this shows something very different from a simple condemnation, a giving up by God of all but the elect. Whatever it proves as to man at large, something more is meant than simply to demonstrate—by that which increases his condemnation—his ruin and helplessness. On the contrary, when the law has proven man's unrighteousness, and the cross that the mind of the flesh is enmity against God, still in this very cross is it manifested that "God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son," and the gospel goes out addressed to every creature.

Thus far we must needs go, then, with the Arminians, and the truth of predestination does not conflict with this in any way. We have here simply to inquire what is, and we can affirm that God in omniscient goodness willed it to be so—from eternity so willed it. He did not of course desire or work the evil, but ordained to allow it, and in this sense that it should be. The mystery of evil being thus suffered we accept, though we do not explain it or suppose it possible to be explained. These facts we know: that evil exists, that God exists, and that He is against the evil. Scripture is of course in no way responsible for it, for while it does not give us an explanation, it gives us such a revelation of God Himself that we can have perfect faith in Him and leave it unexplained. The cross has glorified Him in every attribute more wonderfully as to sin than this could raise suspicion; it demonstrates that mere power could not deal with evil—the victory must be that of goodness, and in suffering.

Christ dying for the world—the testimony of God's love to men at large—is no vain thing because in fact not all are saved by it. It demonstrates to us that infinite goodness from which men have to break away, that of which He has sworn, "As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?" (Ezekiel 33:11).

Men die because of their own will, not because of God's will. Men crudely ask of God's omnipotence why He cannot convert them all, but omnipotence itself must needs be limited by His other attributes. What infinite wisdom can do, I must myself be infinitely wise to know.

Let it suffice us that "God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son," and that full provision has thus been made for the return of all to God—a return for which they are all besought. The result is for man himself to decide.

But now what as to this result? Is it uncertain? Are we to conclude that if a man perishes because he wills himself to perish, that therefore if he lives it is by his own will also? We may not argue so, for here, too, God has spoken: "He was in the world, and the world was made by Him, and the world knew Him not. He came unto His own, and His own received Him not." Was this rejection universal? No, some received Him. What, then, of these? "But as many as received Him, to them gave He [the right (see margin)] to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His Name: which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God" (John 1:1013).

Nothing can possibly be more decisive. This plainly covers the whole ground. It is not, of course, that the will of man is not implied in the reception of Christ, for reception is surely not unwilling, but rather that, as the Apostle tells the Philippians, "It is God which worketh in you both to will and to do"—both the willing and the working—"of His good pleasure" (Philippians 2:13).

Every description of this new birth ascribes it in the fullest to divine and sovereign power. The very idea of "birth" implies it, for who is anything but passive in his own birth? It is also quickening from the dead: "As the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom He will" (John 5:21). It is a new creation: "For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works" (Ephesians 2:10). This defines the character of what is therefore truly effectual calling: "whom He did predestinate, them He also called: and whom He called, them He also justified" (Romans 8:30).

This sovereign, gratuitous work in man, done in accordance with that eternal counsel which works all things out, defines clearly for us what election is. It means the gracious interference of divine love in behalf of those who, no different from others and dead in the same sins, instead of being given up to perish, are given to Christ to be the fruit of His blessed work, "that He might be the firstborn among many brethren" (Romans 8:29). It is love, and only love, righteously and in perfect goodness manifested in salvation only, and of those worthy of damnation. To charge upon it the damnation of the lost is blasphemy, however unconscious, of that in which the whole heart of God is pouring itself out. If others remain obdurate in pride and careless unbelief, going on to destruction while we—justified by faith, and having peace with God—rejoice in hope of the glory of God, is it because we are better than they? What Christian heart can believe this? No; it is because "God, who is rich in mercy, for His great love wherewith He loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ" (Ephesians 2:4,5). No man has found his true level who has not come down there, and only there do we find the full and impregnable assurance of perfect and enduring peace. "Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect?" (Romans 8:33). A love that found us with nothing in order to indue us with all, is a love that has in it no element of change.

"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come"—what possible cause of harm is there that is neither a thing present nor to come?—"nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord" (Romans 8:38,39).

—F.W.G.

One-Sided Theology: Calvinism and Arminianism

We have recently received a long letter, furnishing a very striking proof of the bewildering effect of onesided theology. Our correspondent is evidently under the influence of what is styled the "high school of doctrine." Hence, he cannot see the rightness of calling upon the unconverted to "come," to "hear," to "repent," or to "believe." It seems to him like telling a crabtree to bear some apples in order that it may become an apple tree.

Now, we thoroughly believe that faith is the gift of God, and that it is not according to man's will or by human power. Further, we believe that not a single soul would ever come to Christ if not drawn, yea, compelled by divine grace so to do. Therefore all who are saved have to thank the free and sovereign grace of God for it; their song is, and ever shall be, "Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto Thy name give glory, for Thy mercy, and for Thy truth's sake" (Psalm 115:1).

We believe this, not as part of a certain system of doctrine, but as the revealed truth of God. On the other hand, we believe just as fully in the solemn truth of man's moral responsibility, inasmuch as it is plainly taught in Scripture—though we do not find it among what are called "the five points of the faith of God's elect."

We believe these five points so far as they go, but they are very far indeed from containing the faith of God's elect. There are wide fields of divine revelation which this stunted and onesided system does not touch upon, or even hint at in the most remote manner. Where do we find the heavenly calling? Where, the glorious truth of the Church as the body and bride of Christ? Where, the precious sanctifying hope of the coming of Christ to receive His people to Himself? Where do we have the grand scope of prophecy opened to the vision of our souls, in that which is so pompously styled "the faith of God's elect"? We look in vain for a single trace of them in the entire system to which our friend is attached.

Now, can we suppose for a moment that the blessed apostle Paul would accept as "the faith of God's elect" a system which leaves out that glorious mystery of the Church of which he was especially made the minister? Suppose anyone had shown Paul "the five points" of Calvinism as a statement of the truth of God: what would he have said? "What! 'The whole truth of God … the faith of God's elect … all that is essential to be believed,' and yet not a syllable about the real position of the Church—its calling, its standing, its hopes, or its privileges!"

There is also not a word about Israel's future! A complete ignoring, or at best a thorough alienation, of the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David! The whole body of prophetic teaching subjected to a system of spiritualizing—falsely so called—whereby Israel is robbed of its proper portion, and Christians are dragged down to an earthly level—this is presented to us with the lofty pretension of "The faith of God's elect!"

Thank God it is not so. He, blessed be His name, has not confined Himself within the narrow limits of any school of doctrine—high, low, or moderate. He has revealed Himself. He has told out the deep and precious secrets of His heart. He has unfolded His eternal counsels: as to the Church, as to Israel, the Gentiles, and the wide creation. Men might as well attempt to confine the ocean in buckets of their own formation as to confine the vast range of divine revelation within the feeble enclosures of human systems of doctrine. It cannot be done, and it ought not to be attempted. Better far to set aside the systems of theology and schools of divinity, and come like a little child to the eternal fountain of Holy Scripture and there drink in the living teachings of God's Spirit.

Nothing is more damaging to the truth of God, more withering to the soul, or more subversive of all spiritual growth and progress than mere theology, high or low—Calvinistic or Arminian. It is impossible for the soul to make progress beyond the boundaries of the system to which it is attached. If I am taught to regard "the five points" as "the faith of God's elect," I shall not think of looking beyond them; a most glorious field of heavenly truth is shut out from the vision of my soul. I am stunted, narrowed, onesided, and in danger of getting into that hard, dry state of soul which results from being occupied with mere points of doctrine instead of with Christ.

A disciple of the high school of doctrine will not hear of a worldwide gospel—of God's love to the world—of glad tidings to every creature under Heaven. He only has a gospel for the elect. On the other hand, a disciple of the low, or Arminian, school will not hear of the eternal security of God's people. Their salvation depends partly upon Christ, and partly upon themselves. According to this system, the song of the redeemed should be changed: instead of "Worthy is the Lamb," we should have to add, "and worthy are we." We may be saved today, and lost tomorrow. All this dishonors God, and robs the Christian of all true peace.

We do not write to offend the reader. Nothing is further from our thoughts. We are dealing not with persons, but with schools of doctrine and systems of divinity which we would, most earnestly, entreat our beloved readers to abandon at once and forever. Not one of them contains the full, entire truth of God. There are certain elements of truth in all of them, but the truth is often neutralized by the error. Even if we could find a system which contains, so far as it goes, nothing but the truth, yet if it does not contain the whole truth, its effect upon the soul is pernicious because it leads a person to plume himself on having the truth of God when, in reality, he has only laid hold of a onesided system of man.

Then again, we rarely find a mere disciple of any school of doctrine who can face Scripture as a whole. Favorite texts will be quoted and continually reiterated, but a large body of Scripture is left almost wholly unappropriated. For example, take such passages as the following: "But now [God] commandeth all men every where to repent" (Acts 17:30). Again, "Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth" (1 Timothy 2:4). So also, "The Lord … is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (2 Peter 3:9). In the very closing section of the volume, we read, "Whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely" (Revelation 22:17).

Are these passages to be taken as they stand, or are we to introduce qualifying or modifying words to make them fit in with our system? The fact is, they set forth the largeness of the heart of God, the gracious activities of His nature, and the wide aspect of His love. It is not according to the loving heart of God that any of His creatures should perish. There is no such thing in Scripture as any decree of God consigning a certain number of the human race to eternal damnation.* Some may be judicially given over to blindness because of deliberate rejection of the light (see Romans 9:17; Hebrews 6:46; 10:26,27; 2 Thessalonians 2:11,12; 1 Peter 2:8). All who perish will only have themselves to blame, and all who reach Heaven will only have God to thank.

(FOOTNOTE: * It is deeply interesting to mark the way in which Scripture guards against the repulsive doctrine of reprobation, Look, for example, at Matthew 25:34. Here the King, in addressing those on His right hand, says, "Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." Contrast this with the address to those on His left hand: "Depart from Me, ye cursed [He does not say of 'My Father'], into everlasting fire, prepared [not for you, but] for the devil and his angels" (v. 41). So also, in Romans 9:22,23, when speaking of the "vessels of wrath" it says "fitted to destruction"—fitted not by God surely, but by themselves. On the other hand, when speaking of the "vessels of mercy," it says "which He had afore prepared unto glory." The grand truth of election is fully established; the repulsive error of reprobation is sedulously avoided.)

If we are to be taught by Scripture, we must believe that every man is responsible according to his light. The Gentile is responsible to listen to the voice of creation. The Jew is responsible on the ground of the law. Christendom is responsible on the ground of the fullorbed revelation contained in the whole Word of God. If God commands all men everywhere to repent, does He mean what He says, or merely all the elect? What right do we have to add to, alter, pare down, or accommodate the Word of God? None whatsoever.

Let us face Scripture as it stands, and reject everything which will not stand the test. We may well call in question the soundness of a system which cannot meet the full force of the Word of God as a whole. If passages of Scripture seem to clash, it is only because of our ignorance. Let us humbly own this, and wait on God for further light. This, we may depend upon it, is safe moral ground to occupy. Instead of endeavoring to reconcile apparent discrepancies, let us bow at the Master's feet and justify Him in all His sayings. Thus shall we reap a harvest of blessing, and grow in the knowledge of God and His Word as a whole.

A few days since, a friend put into our hands a sermon recently preached by an eminent clergyman belonging to the high school of doctrine. We have found in this sermon, quite as much as in the letter of our correspondent, the effects of onesided theology. For instance, in referring to that magnificent statement of John the Baptist in John 1:29, the preacher quotes it thus: "The Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the whole world of God's chosen people."

But there is not a word about "God's chosen people" in the passage. It refers to the great propitiatory work of Christ, in virtue of which every trace of sin shall yet be obliterated from the wide creation of God. We shall only see the full application of that blessed Scripture in the new heavens and the new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness. To confine it to the sin of God's elect can only be viewed as the fruit of theological bias.

—C.H.M.